Do vegetarians have fewer strokes?

March 2 2020 by in Bad science, New study, Science & health, Vegetarian diets

A new publication in the journal Neurology suggests that those eating a vegetarian diet have a lower risk of stroke. But, as with most nutritional epidemiology studies, the data may not support the strength of the conclusion.

This paper combined two epidemiological studies, both analyzing health records of Tzu Chi volunteers, which is a very specific population comprised mostly of Buddhists in a specific region in Taiwan. Interestingly, the authors describe the population as follows:

All volunteers went through at least 2 years of training to assure they know the core value of Tzu Chi and quit smoking and drinking alcohol before becoming certified as Tzu Chi volunteers. Vegetarianism is encouraged in this population as a means to promote planetary health and animal welfare. About 30% of the volunteers were full-time vegetarians in both cohorts.”

This is important as it perfectly highlights the concept of healthy user bias. The entire population in the study was trained to be vegetarians for the “betterment of the planet and animal welfare.” What does that say about those who did not become vegetarians? Were they the ones who didn’t care about animals or the environment?

What else did those who resisted becoming vegetarian not care about? While we don’t know the answer, it is clear to me that we are dealing with two distinct groups. Their differing values and habits almost certainly transcend what they eat.

Based on this alone, we have to question the validity of the study results.

This difference is clearly reflected in the baseline characteristics, as the nonvegetarians were more likely to be men, somewhat older, and smokers and alcohol drinkers. They were also more likely to have high blood pressure, elevated fasting glucose, and be overweight.

Once again, it is unclear if any difference in stroke rates between the groups has to do with their diet or with their baseline health and overall lifestyle habits. A study like this is unable to differentiate between the multiple potential factors.

Add to that the fact that both groups sourced 60-64% of their calories from carbohydrates, and you can see that this study has little if any relevance to low-carb omnivores.

What about the results? The relative risk reduction shows that the vegetarians had a 74% reduced risk of strokes in one of the cohorts, and a 48% reduction in the other. Converting these to an absolute risk reduction, the 74% relative risk reduction equates to a 0.5% absolute risk reduction over the 9 years. ¹ The 48% relative risk reduction equates to a 1% absolute risk reduction.²

Finally, this study’s findings contradict the results of a prior study that suggested a higher incidence of hemorrhagic strokes in vegetarians compared to omnivores. It is also contrary to a study from Japan showing higher saturated fat intake is associated with lower stroke risk, and a meta-analysis showing the same. (Note that vegetarian diets tend to be lower in saturated fat than omnivorous diets.) While these studies were also observational and unlikely to prove causation, variability in outcomes underscores the unreliability of observational results.

In the end, we are left with another low-quality nutritional epidemiology study. The results do not impact those of us who are eating a whole-food, low-carb, omnivorous diet. That won’t stop the headlines from promoting this as “proof” that vegetarians have fewer strokes. But now you are prepared with a more detailed analysis of the study, and know that the headlines don’t match the claims.

Thanks for reading,
Bret Scher, MD FACC

Earlier

Expert panel agrees – limits to saturated fat are not evidence-based

Potential health effects of a saturated fat tax are highly speculative

Researchers challenge WHO draft recommendations on saturated fat restriction

Start your FREE 7-day trial!

Get delicious recipes, amazing meal plans, video courses, health guides, and weight loss advice from doctors, dietitians, and other experts.

Join now

Advanced low-carb topics

MEMBERS ONLY
MEMBERS ONLY
MEMBERS ONLY
MEMBERS ONLY
Common mistakes on low carb
15:47
Do you have a hard time losing weight on low carb or keto? Then perhaps you're making one of the common mistakes.
MEMBERS ONLY
MEMBERS ONLY
MEMBERS ONLY
Weight control – calories or insulin
36:26
Is weight loss controlled by calories in and calories out? Or is our body weight carefully regulated by hormones?
MEMBERS ONLY
45:29
Although it is new in popularity, people have been practicing a carnivore diet for decades, and possibly centuries. Does that mean it is safe and without concern?
MEMBERS ONLY
Diet Doctor Podcast #7 – Megan Ramos
54:01
In the seventh episode of Diet Doctor Podcast, Megan Ramos, co-director at IDM program, talks about intermittent fasting, diabetes and her work together with Dr. Jason Fung at the IDM clinic.
A low-carb diet for T2D reversal – Dr. Sarah Hallberg
34:15
What is the best approach to type 2 diabetes reversal? In this presentation, Sarah takes us on a deep-dive into the matter and she puts studies and evidence under the microscope.
MEMBERS ONLY
Do you need to check your ketones?
22:19
Should you measure ketones on a keto diet? Dr. Westman guides you through situations when measuring is beneficial – and when it's not.
The cause of obesity and diabetes
45:52
Why do we get fat – and what can we do about it? Iconic science-writer Gary Taubes answers these questions.
MEMBERS ONLY
MEMBERS ONLY
Ketones: the metabolic advantage
37:04
Can ketones create a possible metabolic advantage?
MEMBERS ONLY
Women's questions introduction
01:36
In this video series, you can find expert views on some of your top questions about low-carb and women's health.
MEMBERS ONLY
Keto-adaptation and performance
58:58
Professor Jeff Volek gives a great overview of the benefits of making your body burn fat for fuel.

44/3626=1.2% vs 10/1424=0.7% ↩
97/5383=1.8% vs 24/2719=0.8%) ↩